Saturday 24 August 2013

About intermodulation, by Claude Everton VE2YI

In any system with non-linear elements, intermodulation between each frequency component will form additional signals at frequencies that are not just at harmonic frequencies (integer multiples) of either, but also at the sum and difference frequencies of the original frequencies and at multiples of those sum and difference frequencies.
2nd and 3rd order intermods are usually the largest ones, with 4th, 5th, etc… the least bothersome due to their levels inherently and continuously decreasing.

 

How are intermodulation products generated?


In areas with numerous closely spaced transmitter antennas or with a large number of mobile stations in operation, possible generation of intermodulation products is considerable.
The output from one transmitter antenna may be radiated into an adjacent transmitter antenna causing unwanted frequencies to appear at the output stage of the transmitter.
The transmitter outputs often operate in "class C" and the non-linear performance of the output transistors may mix with the unwanted input signals, thus radiating new products in addition to the required frequency.

 

What products are generated?


The various frequencies that occur in connection with mixing in the transmitter outputs can be found by a mathematical calculation of the performance of non-linear circuits. The terminology used to define intermodulation products classifies their order as 2nd order, 3rd order, 4th order, etc.
The frequencies are now calculated as the sum or difference between these intermodulation products.



2nd order
2 stations
A + B
A - B
156 + 154 = 310 MHz
156 – 154 = 2 MHz
3rd order
2 stations
2A + B
2A – B
A + 2B
2B – A
2 x 156 + 154 = 466 MHz
2 x 156 – 154 = 158 MHz
156 + 2 x 154 = 464 MHz
2 x 154 – 156 = 152 MHz
3rd order
3 stations
A + B – C
A + C – B
B + C – A
156 + 154 – 158 = 152 MHz
156 + 158 – 154 = 160 MHz
154 + 158 – 156 = 156 MHz
5th order
2 stations
3B – 2A
3A – 2B
3 x 154 – 2 x 156 = 150 MHz
3 x 156 – 2 x 154 = 160 MHz
5th order
3 stations
2A + B – 2C
A + 2B – 2C
2A + C – 2B
A + 2C – 2B
2B + C – 2A
2C + B – 2A
2 x 156 + 154 – 2 x 158 = 150 MHz
156 + 2 x 154 – 2 x 158 = 148 MHz
2 x 156 + 158 – 2 x 154 = 162 MHz
156 + 2 x 158 – 2 x 154 = 164 MHz
2 x 154 + 158 – 2 x 156 = 154 MHz
2 x 158 + 154 – 2 x 156 = 158 MHz
7th order
2 stations
4A – 3B
4B – 3A
4 x 156 – 3 x 154 = 162 MHz
4 x 154 – 3 x 156 = 148 MHz
7th order
3 stations
3A + B – 3C
A + 3B – 3C
3B + C – 3A
3C + B – 3A
3 x 156 + 154 – 3 x 158 = 148 MHz
156 + 3 x 154 – 3 x 158 = 144 MHz
3 x 154 + 158 – 3 x 156 = 152 MHz
3 x 158 + 154 – 3 x 156 = 160 MHz


There are no theoretical limits to the number of mixed products. Fortunately, only a few of these intermodulation products can result in serious consequences.

Products of higher orders, such as 7th – 9th orders and even higher usually have an output so low that they do not create serious problems. At the same time products of even orders, such as 2nd, 4th, 6th orders etc. usually have no importance since in terms of frequency they are blocked in the output filters of the transmitter outputs and are thus not emitted to any noticeable extent. Also, antennas are not usually efficient in the very low and high frequencies created by even order intermodulation products.
If the presence of 2nd order intermodulation products is demonstrated, it is very likely that these products were generated outside the transmitters, for example by mixing in rectifier-type links in antennas, antenna masts, cables, connectors as a result of corrosion.

 

Source of interference


It can be very difficult to ascertain the source of interference.
One of the first steps is to determine whether the source is intermodulation in the transmitter output or in the receiver input where the interference is demonstrated. A third option is intermodulation in antennas, antenna systems, masts, cables, etc. It will be necessary to know the frequencies of the adjacent transmitters.

On the basis of these frequencies all 3rd order IM products in the area of the interfering frequency can be calculated. If it is an area with numerous transmitters, it is worth the trouble to use a computer program to make sure that all mixing products will be included. If the calculation shows a frequency identical with the receiving frequency, the question is whether the mixing product has been generated in one or more of the transmitter outputs or in the receiver input.
By inserting isolators, band-pass filters, notch filters or band-pass/band-reject filters or a combination of these in the transmitter output feeder it will soon be evident whether one of these transmitters is the reason for the interference.

An attenuator can be inserted in the antenna cable of the receiver. If the power of the interfering signal matches the setting of the attenuator, i.e. when 10 dB attenuation reduces the signal by 10 dB, the interfering signal has been generated outside the receiver. If the signal is weakened about 30 dB at 10 dB attenuation, intermodulation is occuring in the receiver input. If the signal is weakened 10-30 dB, there is intermodulation in the receiver as well as a signal from the outside.

Article presented by Claude Everton - VE2YI, Senior Advisor RF Spectrum, Systems & Service, Accès Communications

The First Transatlantic Telegraph Cable Connecting Europe and America

In line with this newsletter’s communication theme, we reflect on a milestone which was achieved, incredibly, during August back in 1858.

Today, less than 5% of the ocean has been explored and yet, to some extent, it was conquered by an eclectic team of our forebears, lead by a businessman with determination and an engineering dream. A telegraph cable snaking its way across the floor of the Atlantic Ocean was connected in 1858 to establish the first instantaneous and accurate communication system linking the European continent with the Americas.

By the 1850s efficient land telegraphy had been established.

(In the early 1800s Samuel Morse and several European inventors proposed the electric telegraph. Morse, however, teaming his telegraph instrument and famous code, inaugurated the world’s first commercial telegraph line. Within decades more than 20,000 miles of telegraph cable crossed the United States of America, contributing to her rapid expansion.)

At this time too, underwater cables were capable of covering short distances, such as the one from Dover to Calais, across the English Channel. Unfortunately, when it came to communication between Britain and the United States, however, it was still up to the sluggish mail steamship.

An entrepreneurial American named Cyrus Field took up the challenge – a challenge considered fanciful by many. He was, however, well placed to give it a go – by 33 years of age he had made a fortune in the wholesale paper business.

In August 1857, after many false starts, two ships met in the middle of the Atlantic ocean, they joined two sections of cable together and then proceeded in opposite directions – one to Ireland and one to Newfoundland. In August 1958 the connection was made, ultimately linking New York and London. Queen Victoria and the American President, James Buchanan, exchanged messages in celebration.

It was a remarkable achievement and was extoled as such then too, some even claiming that it was the most significant achievement of the century. A journalist from the Herald in New York wrote about the achievement a little flamboyantly, “the cable is undoubtedly the Angel in the Book of Revelation with one foot on sea and one foot on land, proclaiming Time is no longer."

Souvenirs from the expedition were popular. Tiffany, the jewellery company, showing foresight, bought up the remainder of the cable from one of the ships and turned it into four-inch souvenir pieces. The Powerhouse Museum has one of these, in its original wooden box, with a letter signed by Cyrus Field authenticating it.

Unfortunately the elation was short-lived. In a matter of weeks the cable deteriorated and then fell silent. Two main issues made it falter; it was too narrow across its diameter and thus too weak and it ran under high voltage, but with insufficient current – errors that would have been foreseen today.

Fortunately Cyrus Field’s dream and purse were both robust. He started again with William Thomson as advisor – a judicious pairing. Thomson was a mathematical physicist and engineer with extensive maritime interests. He had also worked on the mathematical analysis of electricity and on the formulation of the laws of thermodynamics. For more information on this gentleman, go to this Wikipedia link: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thomson,_1st_Baron_Kelvin).

Thomson helped design a new cable and select a suitable galvanometer to detect signals from the ‘far side’.

Field then requisitioned and converted the passenger liner, the SS Great Eastern – the largest ship afloat. The entire length of cable was coiled into her hold. In the briefest of paragraphs his achievement unfolds, and yet Field drove the project for twelve long years. (Bear in mind he was never one to waste time - when traveling abroad, the first word he learned in each new language was "faster").

During these years he crossed the Atlantic more than 30 times to raise money, solve problems and make his cable a reality. And on the 27th July in 1866, Valencia Bay in Ireland and Heart’s Content, Trinity Bay in Newfoundland were connected. The cable was successfully laid allowing for swift and stable communication across the Atlantic.

The consequences were profound for both politics and commerce. For example, news of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865 took 12 days to reach the British press whereas President James Garfield’s demise, in 1881, reached the public across the Atlantic in a matter of hours.

Cyrus Field was most certainly a visionary, but also a man of emotion, hard-working and driven. During one of his failed attempts he was heard to say, "When I thought of all that we had passed through, of the hopes thus far disappointed, of the friends saddened by our reverses.... I felt a load at my heart almost too heavy to bear." He wasn't ready to give up, though: "My confidence was firm and my determination fixed."

After his seemingly illusive goal was achieved Field later promoted other oceanic cables, including telegraph lines from Hawaii to Asia and Australia.

Cyrus Field, the Father of the Transatlantic Cable, died at the age of 72 (having lost his fortune to Wall Street). His achievement was immense, yet the epitaph on his gravestone although succinct, is rather simple: “Cyrus West Field, To whose courage, energy and perseverance, the world owes the Atlantic telegraph.”

Another historical event is worthy of note. It occurred years later, but in the same month. In parallel they reveal the often complex and ironic nature of Man. The building of the Berlin Wall in Germany occurred some years after the end of World War II, in 1961. But rather than to connect its aim was to disconnect the Soviet-controlled communist East and the Allied-controlled capitalist West. (The wall was built despite the inevitable splitting of German families and the potentially contradictory allegiances of people located on either side).

Man will communicate, network, interact and connect, however - it is inevitable! The ‘Wall’ is down and the speed and growth of the World Wide Web reveals this in all its glory (both negatively and positively). But is ‘the sky still the limit’? Certainly not! Just as Cyrus Field navigated the ocean floor and Apollo 11 the boundaries of the skies, engineers will continue to push parameters in an effort to find solutions.

Thanks to the following sites for assistance in the writing of this article:

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/first-transatlantic-telegraph-cable-completed
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/cable/peopleevents/p_field.html

Article presented by Claude Everton - VE2YI, Senior Advisor RF Spectrum, Systems & Service, Accès Communications
(source: IDC Technologies)

Thursday 13 December 2012

Re-introduction of the DVRPTR_V1 Boards :: Press Release



Re-introduction of the DVRPTR_V1 Boards as a Low Cost Solution for Building Hotspots, Repeaters and Stand-alone Repeaters

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Montreal, December 7, 2012

Increased demand for a low-cost solution for building hotspots and repeaters, encouraged the re-introduction of the proven DVRPTR_V1 boards as a viable alternative to the existing offering.

These robust and low-cost boards are a great incentive for many hams to start experimenting with the digital modes.

The "new" DVRPTR_V1 boards will be assembled, individually tested and shipped worldwide from Montreal, Canada. Depending on the demand, the boards are expected to be ready for shipping by the end of February 2013.

" As creator of the original DV-RPTR V1 project (name, hardware and firmware) I'm happy that this project will continue..." said Jan Alte, DO1FJN. "This board is not perfect - I know, but it is a reliable, low-price solution for building hotspots, repeaters and stand-alone repeaters. I will resume my firmware development and I hope to find more dedicated specialists that can help improve the board's open source firmware."

Bruce Given, VE2GZI, hardware engineer with over 20 years of experience in the electronic components business, will coordinate the production and logistics efforts of this project.

"My top priority is to promote this great product in the amateur community and to offer it bundled with timely delivery, excellent service and technical support" said Bruce Given, VE2GZI.

Contact information:
Bruce Given, VE2GZI, bruce.given@gmail.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DVRPTR_V1/

Tuesday 11 September 2012

RAQI Press Release :: Amendment to the Ban of Cellular Telephone Use While Driving

Communiqué 2012-03 – Amendment to the Ban of Cellular Telephone Use While Driving

The ban on the use of cellular telephones while driving came into force in April 2008. Since that time different police departments have issued tickets for the use of various types of devices which could be construed as telephone systems. Those who have received these tickets have vigorously contested them. The courts which have heard these cases have expanded considerably on the meaning of the law to include a multitude of communications equipment far from being cellular telephones.

RAQI has periodically made representations to various government authorities with a view to excluding amateur radio equipment from the ban on the use of cellular telephones while driving. On different occasions such as the RAQI nets or when meeting with club members RAQI has explained that the SAAQ and the Ministry of Transport were waiting to see in which direction the courts would interpret the cellular telephone law.

RAQI has also pointed out that radio amateurs are not the only group affected by the wider interpretation of the courts. For example, among others, the Ministry of Transport itself, Hydro Québec and many others cannot use their radio communications equipment in their own vehicles.

After four years of uncertainty the situation has now been clarified by amendments to the Highway Safety Code which came into effect this past June 6. The new article 439.1 of the code reads as follows:

439.1. No person may, while driving a road vehicle, use a hand-held device that includes a telephone function.

For the purposes of this section, a driver who is holding a hand-held device that includes a telephone function is presumed to be using the device.

This prohibition does not apply to drivers of emergency vehicles in the performance of their duties.

The first paragraph does not apply to a two-way radio, that is to say a cordless voice communication device which does not allow the parties to speak simultaneously.

The Minister may, by order, determine other situations or types of devices to which the prohibition set out in the first paragraph does not apply.

The underlined text is the two paragraphs added on June 6, 2012.

The legislature has retained the spirit of the 2008 law to prevent the use of cellular telephones by the general public while driving without restricting those using radio communications systems which were already in use before the arrival of cellular telephones, such as amateur radio.

RAQI is proud to have contributed, by its representations to the authorities concerned, to the clarification of the text of the law banning the use of cellular telephones while driving and permitting ALL QUEBEC RADIOAMATEURS and not just members of RAQI to continue to use their mobile communications equipment in their vehicles as they always have.

RAQI hopes that the radio amateur community recognizes the importance of a strong provincial association and the support it provides.
(30)

Source: http://raqi.ca/node/278

Links:
The Quebec Highway Safety Code (EN)
Download a printable version of the amendments in PDF format (FR/EN)

Tuesday 3 July 2012

Low power computing platforms for amateur radio :: by Bruce Given VE2GZI

There has been a explosion of cheap and powerful computing platforms appearing in the hobbyist/maker market in the last year.

While these boards can be used in a myriad of digital applications for amateur radio, the purpose of this article is take a quick look at what is out there, to plant some seeds and get the creativeness flowing...

All of these boards run a version of the Linux operations system which is a free Unix like operating system it has a number of advantages over the Microsoft based offerings.

  • It’s free !
  • Posix compliance (reacts to real time events better than windows)
  • Large community support
  • Open source ( Code is open to scrutiny and can be modified for your needs )
  • Complete software development suites in most languages (C++, Java, .Net etc… )
  • Can be configured for a nice graphical interface or Command line interface

Let’s take a look at what’s out there!

I will be ignoring the both the Panda board and the Beagle boards as these are targeted to more of a development environment or are more expensive.

Let`s start with the board that’s creating a lot of buzz

Raspberry Pi [www.raspberrypi.org]
Price: $35.00
Based on the Broadcomm BCM2835 System on a chip.

•    ARM 11 running at 700 MHz processor,
•    Video GPU
•    256 Megabytes of Ram ( Can’t be upgraded)
•    2 USB 2.0 ports
•    HDMI and Composite Video outputs
•    10/100 Ethernet RJ-45 Jack
•    SD Card socket
•    8 × GPIO, UART, I²C bus, SPI bus with two chip selects, +3.3 V, +5 V, ground
•    Audio output from HDMI as well from a standard 3.5mm jack

All in a board 85.60mm x 53.98mm x 17mm.

Current operating systems for this are Debian GNU/Linux, Fedora, Arch Linux ARM, all of these are available on the web so all you have to download them copy them to the SD card and boot the Pi from the SD and you are up and running with a Graphical Linux Operating system.

APC [www.apc.io]
Price:  $49.00
Based on the Via’s Wondermedia  WM8750 System On a Chip

•    ARM 11 running at 800 MHz processor,
•    Video GPU
•    512 Megabytes of Ram ( Can’t be upgraded)
•    4 USB 2.0 ports
•    HDMI and VGA Video outputs
•    10/100 Ethernet RJ-45 Jack
•    MicroSD Card socket
•    Audio output/Input from a standard 3.5mm jack

All this in 170 x 85mm package, this is the NEO-ITX standard which is compatible with Mini-ITX and MicroATX  (this means it will fit in a MicroATX/Mini-ITX PC case).

Currently the only operating system for this is Android 2.3 which ships with it (pretty sure that within a couple of months that there will be a couple of flavors of Linux available for it)

OK, so we have the platforms what are we going to do with them? Well let’s see what some of our fellow hams have started to do …

John Hays of NW Digital radio has successfully downloaded and run Jonathan Naylor’s (G4KLX)         GMSK Repeater and IrcDDB Gateway software on the Raspberry Pi  and there is a D-Star repeater LD1XI in Norway that is now running on the Raspberry Pi connected to the DVRPTR.

The code was even complied on the Raspberry Pi; the OS is Debian "Squeeze" beta. IrcDDBgateway  and DVRPTR repeater run at 10-11% CPU each when active.

Although the APC, which has a little more computing power maybe a better choice, having a D-Star hotspot for the price of the GMSK board and a Raspberry Pi, that’s pretty cool! You are no longer using a PC as the controller.

Expanding on the D-Star hotspot: how about a portable, solar powered, D-Star hotspot based on a APC or Raspberry Pi, with a wireless USB adapter, a GMSK Modem board? Paired with a AMBE codec board it could enable a standard radio to become a D-star radio on any frequency (220mhz, HF,  whatever you'd like...)

Another application for these low power computing platforms could be a controller for a SDR ( Software Defined  Radio). But,  that is a topic that we will get on to on a future article.

Conclusion

By combining digital radio with small form factor, low cost computing platforms and open source free software we have a great recipe for experimentation and a way of getting younger internet savvy  people back into the hobby.

I hope that I have given you a quick look at some of the exciting things that are coming our way and if I can be of any help or if you just want to ask questions you can find me at bruce.given@gmail.com

73, Bruce VE2GZI

Sunday 10 June 2012

My Modular Approach To HF Digital Interfacing :: by Steve Perron VA2PSL


While I do have another interface I built a few years back on a PC board with isolation transformers, RS232 to PTT, VOX PTT and even a sound card to Morse keying interface, I prefer to use a more modular approach to interfacing HF transceivers to a sound card to use the various digital modes. Because getting on HF digital has been as simple as hooking up your transceiver to the sound card of your computer, there's been a wide range of new applications and modes available to experiment with over the past decade. I started playing around with PSK31 when it came out in the late 90s, and my first interface was a simple cable from my sound card to the back of my Icom 735, no audio isolation. I also used an RS232 to PTT that was made with a resistor and the perennial 2N2222a. It worked great, so keep this in mind.
Now, my current little HF rig, the FT-857 is not as simple to interface as some of the newer rigs like the Icom 7200 or the Kenwood TS590 which have built-in USB sound card and radio control, but it does provide a lot more functionality than my old 735. For starters, the radio has settings for audio gain when running digital, aka the back input/output on the rig. There's also a digital VOX and PTT through the CAT interface.

Part 1: The USB Serial Cable

Almost all transceivers made since the mid 80s have some form of serial port interface which provide for the control of the mode, frequency, PTT and on the newer rigs, a lot more. If you've played with Ham Radio Deluxe, you actually get a pretty complete panel to control your radio. Most plans you'll find online or in the magazines are simple RS232 voltage converters (+12V to -12V) to TTL (0V to +5V). You can order USB cables from various sources, but they tend to use the Prolific PL2303 chip which has been cloned by Chinese chip manufacturers. Prolific has added an anti-clone feature in their drivers which is why all these USB programming cables from China do not work with the latest drivers. I had a CAT (Yaesu's name for this interface) USB cable with the PL2303 clone, and it simply died on me. My new interface uses the CP2102 from Silicon labs. The drivers actually work, and you can pick up the ready-made modules on eBay for less than 3$. As I said earlier, quite a few software support the PTT functionality directly through this interface, including my favorite software, FLDIGI. FLDIGI is available on most operating systems, including Linux. So when running FLDIGI, I get both the control of the mode/frequency and the PTT using my simple USB to CAT interface. See the pictures below. All that is required on the Yaesu and Kenwood is for the RX/TX and GND to be connected to the connector on the back of the transceiver. If you're using an Icom transceiver, the RX and TX would be tied together, since the interface is half-duplex. My module did not follow the convention of RX->TX, TX->RX, but rather RX->RX and TX->TX, so please be aware. If it's not working for you, simply swap the wires around. In windows, the interface will be assigned a Com port. Under Linux, it will be /dev/ttyUSB0, when the 0 could be a different number if like me you have more than one USB-Serial cable attached.

Part 2: The Sound card Interface


My audio interface is even simpler. I simply used half of an audio cable with female RCA jacks soldered to a mini-din8 on the ground, Audio in and Audio Out pins. I'm later going to add another RCA jack for the PTT line. My other cable is an eBay-special Griffin stereo isolation cable. While this cable is not available anymore, any similar cable/interface could be used. I installed 3.5mm stereo plugs on one end, and I replaced the male RCA on the other end so that I could make a simple voltage divider to reduce the audio amplitude of the signal so it would be more compatible with most transceivers out there. It's not required on the FT857 thanks to the programmable audio gain, but I want my cable to be compatible with most rigs. The voltage divider is simply two resistors, 10k and 1k, soldered inside the RCA jack going to the audio in of the transceiver. You can see that I'm also using a USB sound card. This is mostly to avoid transmitting operating system sounds and some laptops lack any form of audio input.










Part 3: The Optional RS232 PTT Interface

This interface is simply an opto-isolator inside a DB9 housing. It can be used with any serial port, including most USB-Serial cables. The CP2102 module I discussed earlier lacks the required RTS or DTR signals. To keep the little PCB as simple as possible, I only use the DTR. The PCB was done freehand using a Dremel tool. You can find the schematic of the interface online or even in the ARRL handbook. This interface would be required if the software does not support CAT PTT, VOX is not available or undesirable. An example of this would be when running the UZ7HO sound card packet modem. There are numerous amateurs using APRS on HF with this modem. Alternatively, it could also be used as a software Morse keyer. N1MM and other logging software support this as well as the CW-daemon in Linux.








 



Part 4: Digital Modes Software and Random Ramblings

There are a few software I find more interesting. FLDIGI is the Swiss army-knife of digital modes. I'm only aware of one software that supports more different modes, MultiPSK, but I find it not user-friendly and it does not run on Linux. PSK Mail is a software than runs of top of FLDIGI and provides ARQ email throughout the world (Think Amtor, Pactor). Winmor is a modem that can be used with RMS Express to provide access to the Winlink 2000 system without an expensive SCS-PTC Pactor modem. While I would not rely on Winmor to do mission-critical emails, it can be useful to check your emails if you're in an area that does not have any other forms of coverage. Winmor is only available on Windows.
I don't recommend using the microphone jack unless your rig only has this input. The microphone jack has much more gain than the digital port at the back of your radio and this can lead to over-modulation. Most commercially made interfaces simply regroup all these functionalities in a pretty box. The wildly popular Signalink interface from Tigertronics is a USB soundcard with audio isolation and a VOX setup. The VOX would be redundant on my transceiver, and I prefer not to use VOX, as it tends to mangle most ARQ modes, like HF packet. The first few milliseconds of the transmission would be missing because VOX always has latency.

Friday 8 June 2012

My digital experience with the Motorola XPR5500, DMR and Capacity Plus

Motorola XPR5550 - Mobile Setup

 I got my Motorola XPR5500 a few weeks ago and I thought it's about time to share my first impressions. (Actually, Claude gently pushed me to do it ...)

I will start with the audio: it's absolutely fantastic! Both on analog and TRBO digital (DMR)... The front-facing speaker is loud and delivers a full spectrum, rich audio. The Intelligent Audio option adds another level of enhancement by automatically adjusting the volume depending on the surrounding noise.
All the above combined with the DMR enhanced digital vocoder make this radio sound amazing!



A side note: When Claude VE2YI told me that the DMR vocoder is much better than the DSTAR one, I was skeptical and I thought he was biased ... Using a portable XPR6550 radio made me doubt my original judgment. As soon as I turned on the XPR5550, on  I had a "WOW" moment: it does sound much better. The voices are far less "robotic" then DSTAR and the audio spectrum seems to be richer.
 
Another nice addition is the color display. Although others will dismiss it as a "gadget", I am really happy with it. It is bright enough in direct sunlight and it allows me to read the status of the radio and to check the IDs in a glance. I think the contrast of the display is much better than any "standard" radio displays. The display's day/night mode comes very handy while driving at night.

Bluetooth data and audio is another relatively new feature on a commercial radio. While I was told that programming the radio via Bluetooth is a breeze, I prefer to do it the old fashion way, using a cable ... I didn't try to hook up my Bluetooth headset yet, but I'll give it a try soon.
And speaking about programming cable, I was absolutely thrilled to find out how easy is to build one for the XPR5550. It takes 10 minutes and the only things you need are a standard USB printer cable, some mini MOLEX connectors (or the original blank accessory plug that comes with the radio) and a little dexterity.

The XPR5550 comes also equipped standard with GPS, but as far as I know, I don't think you can interface it with the APRS/DPRS system. Maybe in a near future ...

Another interesting option is the text messaging. I guess it works only in digital mode but it's a neat feature ...

I received my XPR5550 equipped with the RMN5127 Impres Keypad Microphone which gives me the possibility to control the radio without reaching for it. I was impressed by the way this microphone sounded on the air so I specifically asked Claude for one. The microphone suppresses the ambient noise and it has a very high quality audio amplifier.

The only thing missing from my setup is the separation kit for the XPR5550 ... I hope it will come out soon.

I will end this post by thanking Claude VE2YI and Alain VA2SPB for their support.